| | | | YES | | NO | | | | Reported * | |   | |   | | | ED 1 |
99.00% | | 195 | | 82 | | | ED 2 |
99.00% | | 256 | | 116 | | | ED 3 |
99.00% | | 187 | | 84 | | | ED 4 |
99.00% | | 222 | | 85 | | | ED 5 |
99.00% | | 225 | | 134 | | | ED 6 |
99.00% | | 0 | | 1 | | | ED 7 |
99.00% | | 251 | | 123 | | | ED 8 |
99.00% | | 255 | | 132 | | | ED 9 |
99.00% | | 213 | | 104 | | | ED 10 |
99.00% | | 213 | | 58 | | | ED 11 |
99.00% | | 311 | | 121 | | | ED 12 |
99.00% | | 121 | | 37 | | | ED 13 |
99.00% | | 168 | | 71 | | | ED 14 |
99.00% | | 208 | | 75 | | | ED 15 |
99.00% | | 42 | | 15 | | | ED 16 |
99.00% | | 120 | | 54 | | | ED 17 |
99.00% | | 217 | | 96 | | | ED 18 |
99.00% | | 201 | | 84 | | | ED 19 |
99.00% | | 171 | | 85 | | | ED 20 |
99.00% | | 235 | | 94 | | | ED 21 |
99.00% | | 167 | | 84 | | | ED 22 |
99.00% | | 209 | | 85 | | | ED 23 |
99.00% | | 213 | | 113 | | | ED 24 |
99.00% | | 35 | | 8 | | | ED 25 |
99.00% | | 275 | | 107 | | | ED 26 |
99.00% | | 181 | | 84 | | | ED 27 |
99.00% | | 254 | | 152 | | | ED 28 |
99.00% | | 241 | | 93 | | | ED 29 |
99.00% | | 172 | | 86 | | | ED 30 |
99.00% | | 239 | | 121 | | | ED 31 |
99.00% | | 242 | | 105 | | | ED 32 |
99.00% | | 461 | | 187 | | | ED 33 |
90.91% | | 218 | | 79 | | | ED 34 |
90.91% | | 197 | | 72 | | | ED 35 |
90.91% | | 184 | | 58 | | | ED 36 |
99.00% | | 157 | | 48 | | | ED 37 |
99.00% | | 185 | | 88 | | | ED 38 |
90.91% | | 144 | | 47 | | | ED 39 |
99.00% | | 204 | | 93 | | | ED 40 |
99.00% | | 147 | | 66 | | | ED 41 |
99.00% | | 152 | | 76 | | | ED 42 |
99.00% | | 189 | | 84 | | | ED 43 |
99.00% | | 217 | | 92 | | | ED 44 |
99.00% | | 203 | | 132 | | | ED 45 |
99.00% | | 216 | | 93 | | | ED 46 |
99.00% | | 132 | | 52 | | | ED 47 |
99.00% | | 166 | | 88 | | | ED 48 |
99.00% | | 0 | | 0 | | | ED 49 |
99.00% | | 0 | | 0 | | | ED 50 |
99.00% | | 0 | | 0 | | | Total | | | 9211 | | 4044 | |
* Percentage of Scanners Reported
Information As Of: 2026-11-04 00:42:08 EST
AD: Assembly District ED: Election District
|