| | | | YES | | NO | | | | Reported * | | | | | | | ED 1 |
80.00% | | 168 | | 66 | | | ED 2 |
99.00% | | 474 | | 197 | | | ED 3 |
80.00% | | 252 | | 122 | | | ED 4 |
99.00% | | 185 | | 90 | | | ED 5 |
99.00% | | 429 | | 221 | | | ED 6 |
99.00% | | 271 | | 156 | | | ED 7 |
99.00% | | 45 | | 33 | | | ED 8 |
99.00% | | 29 | | 13 | | | ED 9 |
99.00% | | 214 | | 246 | | | ED 10 |
80.00% | | 52 | | 16 | | | ED 11 |
99.00% | | 165 | | 244 | | | ED 12 |
99.00% | | 261 | | 373 | | | ED 13 |
99.00% | | 332 | | 248 | | | ED 14 |
99.00% | | 255 | | 262 | | | ED 15 |
99.00% | | 182 | | 154 | | | ED 16 |
99.00% | | 214 | | 262 | | | ED 17 |
99.00% | | 257 | | 276 | | | ED 18 |
99.00% | | 333 | | 261 | | | ED 19 |
99.00% | | 346 | | 187 | | | ED 20 |
99.00% | | 305 | | 201 | | | ED 21 |
85.71% | | 268 | | 130 | | | ED 22 |
85.71% | | 250 | | 149 | | | ED 23 |
85.71% | | 189 | | 108 | | | ED 24 |
85.71% | | 164 | | 137 | | | ED 25 |
87.50% | | 277 | | 232 | | | ED 26 |
87.50% | | 254 | | 247 | | | ED 27 |
87.50% | | 275 | | 172 | | | ED 28 |
87.50% | | 245 | | 126 | | | ED 29 |
87.50% | | 269 | | 216 | | | ED 30 |
87.50% | | 198 | | 191 | | | ED 31 |
99.00% | | 230 | | 175 | | | ED 32 |
99.00% | | 239 | | 146 | | | ED 33 |
99.00% | | 254 | | 291 | | | ED 34 |
99.00% | | 298 | | 218 | | | ED 35 |
99.00% | | 266 | | 162 | | | ED 36 |
87.50% | | 216 | | 182 | | | ED 37 |
99.00% | | 160 | | 79 | | | ED 38 |
99.00% | | 181 | | 99 | | | ED 39 |
99.00% | | 154 | | 119 | | | ED 40 |
99.00% | | 215 | | 105 | | | ED 41 |
99.00% | | 143 | | 64 | | | ED 42 |
99.00% | | 224 | | 88 | | | ED 43 |
99.00% | | 189 | | 92 | | | ED 44 |
99.00% | | 215 | | 92 | | | ED 45 |
99.00% | | 285 | | 112 | | | ED 46 |
99.00% | | 151 | | 85 | | | ED 47 |
99.00% | | 100 | | 67 | | | ED 48 |
99.00% | | 0 | | 0 | | | ED 49 |
99.00% | | 0 | | 0 | | | Total | | | 10678 | | 7512 | |
* Percentage of Scanners Reported
Information As Of: 2026-11-04 00:42:08 EST
AD: Assembly District
ED: Election District
|
