| | | | YES | | NO | | | | Reported * | | | | | | | ED 1 |
99.00% | | 196 | | 48 | | | ED 2 |
99.00% | | 265 | | 87 | | | ED 3 |
99.00% | | 222 | | 71 | | | ED 4 |
99.00% | | 193 | | 63 | | | ED 5 |
99.00% | | 186 | | 65 | | | ED 6 |
99.00% | | 200 | | 65 | | | ED 7 |
99.00% | | 256 | | 71 | | | ED 8 |
99.00% | | 217 | | 60 | | | ED 9 |
99.00% | | 233 | | 79 | | | ED 10 |
88.89% | | 224 | | 85 | | | ED 11 |
88.89% | | 227 | | 87 | | | ED 12 |
99.00% | | 226 | | 75 | | | ED 13 |
99.00% | | 270 | | 81 | | | ED 14 |
99.00% | | 132 | | 64 | | | ED 15 |
99.00% | | 114 | | 39 | | | ED 16 |
99.00% | | 231 | | 101 | | | ED 17 |
99.00% | | 143 | | 50 | | | ED 18 |
99.00% | | 207 | | 77 | | | ED 19 |
99.00% | | 159 | | 62 | | | ED 20 |
99.00% | | 170 | | 46 | | | ED 21 |
99.00% | | 216 | | 106 | | | ED 22 |
99.00% | | 175 | | 59 | | | ED 23 |
99.00% | | 146 | | 58 | | | ED 24 |
83.33% | | 168 | | 63 | | | ED 25 |
83.33% | | 176 | | 74 | | | ED 26 |
90.91% | | 199 | | 98 | | | ED 27 |
90.91% | | 167 | | 71 | | | ED 28 |
90.91% | | 190 | | 69 | | | ED 29 |
90.91% | | 158 | | 58 | | | ED 30 |
99.00% | | 240 | | 70 | | | ED 31 |
99.00% | | 228 | | 86 | | | ED 32 |
99.00% | | 186 | | 66 | | | ED 33 |
99.00% | | 265 | | 86 | | | ED 34 |
99.00% | | 167 | | 62 | | | ED 35 |
99.00% | | 100 | | 34 | | | ED 36 |
99.00% | | 155 | | 41 | | | ED 37 |
99.00% | | 216 | | 77 | | | ED 38 |
99.00% | | 239 | | 64 | | | ED 39 |
99.00% | | 167 | | 52 | | | ED 40 |
99.00% | | 134 | | 51 | | | ED 41 |
99.00% | | 184 | | 71 | | | ED 42 |
99.00% | | 211 | | 84 | | | ED 43 |
99.00% | | 169 | | 71 | | | ED 44 |
99.00% | | 186 | | 53 | | | ED 45 |
99.00% | | 46 | | 16 | | | ED 46 |
99.00% | | 165 | | 44 | | | ED 47 |
99.00% | | 172 | | 68 | | | ED 48 |
99.00% | | 161 | | 52 | | | ED 49 |
99.00% | | 0 | | 0 | | | ED 50 |
83.33% | | 0 | | 0 | | | Total | | | 9057 | | 3180 | |
* Percentage of Scanners Reported
Information As Of: 2026-11-04 00:41:23 EST
AD: Assembly District
ED: Election District
|
