| | | | YES | | NO | | | | Reported * | | | | | | | ED 1 |
99.00% | | 171 | | 68 | | | ED 2 |
99.00% | | 257 | | 100 | | | ED 3 |
99.00% | | 234 | | 72 | | | ED 4 |
99.00% | | 188 | | 77 | | | ED 5 |
99.00% | | 184 | | 75 | | | ED 6 |
99.00% | | 191 | | 78 | | | ED 7 |
99.00% | | 257 | | 80 | | | ED 8 |
99.00% | | 205 | | 76 | | | ED 9 |
99.00% | | 229 | | 87 | | | ED 10 |
88.89% | | 213 | | 106 | | | ED 11 |
88.89% | | 216 | | 105 | | | ED 12 |
99.00% | | 210 | | 95 | | | ED 13 |
99.00% | | 241 | | 112 | | | ED 14 |
99.00% | | 134 | | 69 | | | ED 15 |
99.00% | | 109 | | 52 | | | ED 16 |
99.00% | | 220 | | 112 | | | ED 17 |
99.00% | | 139 | | 51 | | | ED 18 |
99.00% | | 203 | | 84 | | | ED 19 |
99.00% | | 149 | | 77 | | | ED 20 |
99.00% | | 167 | | 54 | | | ED 21 |
99.00% | | 212 | | 113 | | | ED 22 |
99.00% | | 170 | | 72 | | | ED 23 |
99.00% | | 139 | | 65 | | | ED 24 |
83.33% | | 150 | | 85 | | | ED 25 |
83.33% | | 180 | | 78 | | | ED 26 |
90.91% | | 183 | | 119 | | | ED 27 |
90.91% | | 157 | | 87 | | | ED 28 |
90.91% | | 176 | | 84 | | | ED 29 |
90.91% | | 154 | | 65 | | | ED 30 |
99.00% | | 235 | | 81 | | | ED 31 |
99.00% | | 211 | | 111 | | | ED 32 |
99.00% | | 177 | | 78 | | | ED 33 |
99.00% | | 250 | | 103 | | | ED 34 |
99.00% | | 152 | | 81 | | | ED 35 |
99.00% | | 100 | | 37 | | | ED 36 |
99.00% | | 152 | | 48 | | | ED 37 |
99.00% | | 194 | | 99 | | | ED 38 |
99.00% | | 238 | | 70 | | | ED 39 |
99.00% | | 160 | | 62 | | | ED 40 |
99.00% | | 125 | | 68 | | | ED 41 |
99.00% | | 184 | | 76 | | | ED 42 |
99.00% | | 206 | | 94 | | | ED 43 |
99.00% | | 159 | | 83 | | | ED 44 |
99.00% | | 179 | | 60 | | | ED 45 |
99.00% | | 41 | | 20 | | | ED 46 |
99.00% | | 153 | | 60 | | | ED 47 |
99.00% | | 166 | | 81 | | | ED 48 |
99.00% | | 151 | | 61 | | | ED 49 |
99.00% | | 0 | | 0 | | | ED 50 |
83.33% | | 0 | | 0 | | | Total | | | 8671 | | 3771 | |
* Percentage of Scanners Reported
Information As Of: 2026-11-04 00:42:08 EST
AD: Assembly District
ED: Election District
|
