| | | | YES | | NO | | | | Reported * | | | | | | | ED 1 |
99.00% | | 203 | | 78 | | | ED 2 |
99.00% | | 246 | | 129 | | | ED 3 |
99.00% | | 187 | | 94 | | | ED 4 |
99.00% | | 225 | | 98 | | | ED 5 |
99.00% | | 243 | | 128 | | | ED 6 |
99.00% | | 2 | | 0 | | | ED 7 |
99.00% | | 257 | | 125 | | | ED 8 |
99.00% | | 232 | | 154 | | | ED 9 |
99.00% | | 205 | | 115 | | | ED 10 |
99.00% | | 199 | | 80 | | | ED 11 |
99.00% | | 314 | | 129 | | | ED 12 |
99.00% | | 118 | | 47 | | | ED 13 |
99.00% | | 190 | | 59 | | | ED 14 |
99.00% | | 205 | | 97 | | | ED 15 |
99.00% | | 43 | | 13 | | | ED 16 |
99.00% | | 134 | | 46 | | | ED 17 |
99.00% | | 217 | | 107 | | | ED 18 |
99.00% | | 228 | | 78 | | | ED 19 |
99.00% | | 184 | | 80 | | | ED 20 |
99.00% | | 234 | | 101 | | | ED 21 |
99.00% | | 168 | | 84 | | | ED 22 |
99.00% | | 205 | | 100 | | | ED 23 |
99.00% | | 214 | | 119 | | | ED 24 |
99.00% | | 35 | | 9 | | | ED 25 |
99.00% | | 251 | | 135 | | | ED 26 |
99.00% | | 186 | | 88 | | | ED 27 |
99.00% | | 245 | | 163 | | | ED 28 |
99.00% | | 246 | | 99 | | | ED 29 |
99.00% | | 159 | | 98 | | | ED 30 |
99.00% | | 223 | | 136 | | | ED 31 |
99.00% | | 230 | | 126 | | | ED 32 |
99.00% | | 436 | | 218 | | | ED 33 |
90.91% | | 226 | | 81 | | | ED 34 |
90.91% | | 203 | | 81 | | | ED 35 |
90.91% | | 189 | | 63 | | | ED 36 |
99.00% | | 158 | | 55 | | | ED 37 |
99.00% | | 181 | | 100 | | | ED 38 |
90.91% | | 149 | | 51 | | | ED 39 |
99.00% | | 207 | | 99 | | | ED 40 |
99.00% | | 165 | | 57 | | | ED 41 |
99.00% | | 150 | | 86 | | | ED 42 |
99.00% | | 189 | | 91 | | | ED 43 |
99.00% | | 205 | | 115 | | | ED 44 |
99.00% | | 210 | | 133 | | | ED 45 |
99.00% | | 211 | | 102 | | | ED 46 |
99.00% | | 122 | | 70 | | | ED 47 |
99.00% | | 172 | | 87 | | | ED 48 |
99.00% | | 0 | | 0 | | | ED 49 |
99.00% | | 0 | | 0 | | | ED 50 |
99.00% | | 0 | | 0 | | | Total | | | 9201 | | 4404 | |
* Percentage of Scanners Reported
Information As Of: 2026-11-04 00:42:08 EST
AD: Assembly District
ED: Election District
|
