| | | | Matthew Mobilia | | Sam T. Pirozzolo | | Sam T. Pirozzolo | | WRITE-IN | | | | Reported * | | (Democratic) | | (Republican) | | (Conservative) | |   | | | ED 1 |
99.00% | | 436 | | 76 | | 7 | | 0 | | | ED 2 |
99.00% | | 324 | | 106 | | 12 | | 0 | | | ED 3 |
99.00% | | 218 | | 153 | | 11 | | 1 | | | ED 4 |
90.00% | | 252 | | 174 | | 12 | | 0 | | | ED 5 |
90.00% | | 217 | | 139 | | 15 | | 0 | | | ED 6 |
90.00% | | 244 | | 239 | | 26 | | 1 | | | ED 7 |
90.00% | | 197 | | 247 | | 17 | | 2 | | | ED 8 |
99.00% | | 114 | | 99 | | 8 | | 0 | | | ED 9 |
99.00% | | 62 | | 71 | | 3 | | 0 | | | ED 10 |
99.00% | | 370 | | 157 | | 9 | | 0 | | | ED 11 |
99.00% | | 276 | | 233 | | 19 | | 0 | | | ED 12 |
99.00% | | 227 | | 219 | | 14 | | 0 | | | ED 13 |
99.00% | | 227 | | 86 | | 9 | | 0 | | | ED 14 |
99.00% | | 288 | | 289 | | 28 | | 1 | | | ED 15 |
87.50% | | 266 | | 212 | | 15 | | 0 | | | ED 16 |
99.00% | | 422 | | 255 | | 29 | | 2 | | | ED 17 |
99.00% | | 300 | | 429 | | 27 | | 0 | | | ED 18 |
99.00% | | 318 | | 416 | | 44 | | 3 | | | ED 19 |
99.00% | | 105 | | 116 | | 14 | | 2 | | | ED 20 |
99.00% | | 165 | | 236 | | 23 | | 0 | | | ED 21 |
99.00% | | 189 | | 248 | | 13 | | 1 | | | ED 22 |
99.00% | | 146 | | 29 | | 4 | | 0 | | | ED 23 |
99.00% | | 200 | | 146 | | 13 | | 2 | | | ED 24 |
99.00% | | 382 | | 273 | | 11 | | 0 | | | ED 25 |
99.00% | | 162 | | 333 | | 12 | | 1 | | | ED 26 |
99.00% | | 186 | | 332 | | 20 | | 4 | | | ED 27 |
99.00% | | 219 | | 241 | | 33 | | 1 | | | ED 28 |
99.00% | | 286 | | 463 | | 43 | | 0 | | | ED 29 |
99.00% | | 289 | | 437 | | 31 | | 1 | | | ED 30 |
99.00% | | 287 | | 422 | | 43 | | 0 | | | ED 31 |
99.00% | | 292 | | 422 | | 55 | | 4 | | | ED 32 |
99.00% | | 309 | | 445 | | 45 | | 2 | | | ED 33 |
99.00% | | 186 | | 265 | | 18 | | 0 | | | ED 34 |
99.00% | | 305 | | 330 | | 25 | | 0 | | | ED 35 |
99.00% | | 305 | | 348 | | 24 | | 0 | | | ED 36 |
99.00% | | 490 | | 68 | | 7 | | 1 | | | ED 37 |
99.00% | | 460 | | 74 | | 4 | | 0 | | | ED 38 |
99.00% | | 228 | | 24 | | 5 | | 0 | | | ED 39 |
99.00% | | 377 | | 63 | | 16 | | 0 | | | ED 40 |
99.00% | | 416 | | 104 | | 9 | | 0 | | | ED 41 |
99.00% | | 446 | | 161 | | 9 | | 1 | | | ED 42 |
99.00% | | 275 | | 215 | | 11 | | 0 | | | ED 43 |
99.00% | | 346 | | 169 | | 17 | | 1 | | | ED 44 |
99.00% | | 268 | | 352 | | 22 | | 2 | | | ED 45 |
99.00% | | 233 | | 303 | | 18 | | 1 | | | ED 46 |
99.00% | | 224 | | 313 | | 15 | | 1 | | | ED 47 |
99.00% | | 242 | | 309 | | 10 | | 1 | | | ED 48 |
99.00% | | 175 | | 227 | | 7 | | 0 | | | ED 49 |
99.00% | | 183 | | 243 | | 19 | | 0 | | | ED 50 |
99.00% | | 9 | | 20 | | 0 | | 0 | | | ED 51 |
99.00% | | 206 | | 377 | | 26 | | 0 | | | ED 52 |
99.00% | | 303 | | 441 | | 25 | | 0 | | | ED 53 |
99.00% | | 262 | | 167 | | 21 | | 1 | | | ED 54 |
99.00% | | 210 | | 348 | | 22 | | 0 | | | ED 55 |
99.00% | | 143 | | 321 | | 26 | | 1 | | | ED 56 |
99.00% | | 226 | | 300 | | 33 | | 0 | | | ED 57 |
99.00% | | 199 | | 317 | | 17 | | 0 | | | ED 58 |
99.00% | | 207 | | 253 | | 20 | | 0 | | | ED 59 |
99.00% | | 221 | | 365 | | 21 | | 0 | | | ED 60 |
99.00% | | 212 | | 551 | | 19 | | 1 | | | ED 61 |
99.00% | | 241 | | 362 | | 13 | | 0 | | | ED 62 |
99.00% | | 176 | | 232 | | 18 | | 0 | | | ED 63 |
99.00% | | 152 | | 278 | | 16 | | 0 | | | ED 64 |
99.00% | | 136 | | 277 | | 10 | | 0 | | | ED 65 |
99.00% | | 97 | | 209 | | 17 | | 0 | | | ED 66 |
99.00% | | 160 | | 212 | | 14 | | 0 | | | ED 67 |
90.00% | | 211 | | 199 | | 15 | | 0 | | | ED 68 |
99.00% | | 136 | | 231 | | 11 | | 0 | | | ED 69 |
87.50% | | 368 | | 284 | | 22 | | 1 | | | ED 70 |
99.00% | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | | ED 71 |
99.00% | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | | ED 72 |
99.00% | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | | ED 73 |
99.00% | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | | ED 74 |
99.00% | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | | ED 75 |
99.00% | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | | Total | | | 17009 | | 17055 | | 1267 | | 40 | |
* Percentage of Scanners Reported
Information As Of: 2026-11-04 00:42:08 EST
AD: Assembly District ED: Election District
|