| | | | Tim Qorraj | | Michael Tannousis | | Michael Tannousis | | WRITE-IN | | | | Reported * | | (Democratic) | | (Republican) | | (Conservative) | | | | | ED 1 |
99.00% | | 174 | | 501 | | 49 | | 1 | | | ED 2 |
99.00% | | 175 | | 571 | | 39 | | 0 | | | ED 3 |
99.00% | | 218 | | 627 | | 39 | | 0 | | | ED 4 |
99.00% | | 184 | | 424 | | 22 | | 1 | | | ED 5 |
99.00% | | 177 | | 609 | | 45 | | 1 | | | ED 6 |
99.00% | | 170 | | 540 | | 38 | | 0 | | | ED 7 |
99.00% | | 207 | | 480 | | 28 | | 0 | | | ED 8 |
99.00% | | 206 | | 458 | | 34 | | 0 | | | ED 9 |
99.00% | | 179 | | 628 | | 43 | | 1 | | | ED 10 |
99.00% | | 157 | | 422 | | 19 | | 1 | | | ED 11 |
99.00% | | 211 | | 403 | | 36 | | 1 | | | ED 12 |
87.50% | | 260 | | 225 | | 16 | | 0 | | | ED 13 |
87.50% | | 176 | | 276 | | 14 | | 1 | | | ED 14 |
87.50% | | 154 | | 271 | | 16 | | 0 | | | ED 15 |
99.00% | | 205 | | 519 | | 29 | | 0 | | | ED 16 |
99.00% | | 238 | | 500 | | 33 | | 0 | | | ED 17 |
99.00% | | 235 | | 459 | | 42 | | 0 | | | ED 18 |
99.00% | | 242 | | 525 | | 26 | | 1 | | | ED 19 |
99.00% | | 108 | | 199 | | 11 | | 0 | | | ED 20 |
99.00% | | 6 | | 21 | | 1 | | 1 | | | ED 21 |
99.00% | | 202 | | 493 | | 36 | | 2 | | | ED 22 |
99.00% | | 210 | | 414 | | 28 | | 3 | | | ED 23 |
99.00% | | 206 | | 332 | | 23 | | 1 | | | ED 24 |
99.00% | | 237 | | 485 | | 40 | | 1 | | | ED 25 |
99.00% | | 187 | | 361 | | 18 | | 0 | | | ED 26 |
99.00% | | 176 | | 84 | | 5 | | 0 | | | ED 27 |
99.00% | | 212 | | 334 | | 36 | | 0 | | | ED 28 |
99.00% | | 230 | | 327 | | 20 | | 0 | | | ED 29 |
99.00% | | 196 | | 385 | | 30 | | 0 | | | ED 30 |
99.00% | | 102 | | 178 | | 12 | | 1 | | | ED 31 |
99.00% | | 209 | | 340 | | 26 | | 1 | | | ED 32 |
99.00% | | 241 | | 353 | | 30 | | 0 | | | ED 33 |
99.00% | | 194 | | 288 | | 15 | | 1 | | | ED 34 |
99.00% | | 227 | | 352 | | 26 | | 2 | | | ED 35 |
99.00% | | 135 | | 293 | | 16 | | 1 | | | ED 36 |
99.00% | | 230 | | 336 | | 27 | | 1 | | | ED 37 |
99.00% | | 260 | | 457 | | 28 | | 3 | | | ED 38 |
99.00% | | 149 | | 279 | | 16 | | 1 | | | ED 39 |
99.00% | | 183 | | 467 | | 31 | | 0 | | | ED 40 |
99.00% | | 208 | | 99 | | 11 | | 0 | | | ED 41 |
99.00% | | 196 | | 317 | | 21 | | 0 | | | ED 42 |
99.00% | | 201 | | 257 | | 20 | | 0 | | | ED 43 |
99.00% | | 206 | | 325 | | 22 | | 0 | | | ED 44 |
99.00% | | 229 | | 306 | | 14 | | 1 | | | ED 45 |
99.00% | | 299 | | 361 | | 24 | | 2 | | | ED 46 |
99.00% | | 221 | | 159 | | 13 | | 0 | | | ED 47 |
99.00% | | 160 | | 182 | | 24 | | 0 | | | ED 48 |
99.00% | | 137 | | 217 | | 14 | | 1 | | | ED 49 |
99.00% | | 191 | | 284 | | 14 | | 1 | | | ED 50 |
99.00% | | 102 | | 182 | | 11 | | 0 | | | ED 51 |
99.00% | | 48 | | 21 | | 3 | | 0 | | | ED 52 |
99.00% | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | | ED 53 |
99.00% | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | | ED 54 |
99.00% | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | | ED 55 |
99.00% | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | | ED 56 |
99.00% | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | | ED 57 |
99.00% | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | | ED 58 |
99.00% | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | | ED 59 |
99.00% | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | | ED 60 |
99.00% | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | | ED 61 |
99.00% | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | | Total | | | 9666 | | 17926 | | 1234 | | 32 | |
* Percentage of Scanners Reported
Information As Of: 2026-11-04 00:42:08 EST
AD: Assembly District
ED: Election District
|
