| | | | Darializa Avila Chevalier | | Jomo M. Williams | | Darializa Avila Chevalier | | WRITE-IN | | | | Reported * | | (Democratic) | | (Republican) | | (Working Families) | | | | | ED 1 |
99.00% | | 314 | | 42 | | 18 | | 0 | | | ED 2 |
50.00% | | 139 | | 26 | | 16 | | 1 | | | ED 3 |
50.00% | | 107 | | 20 | | 25 | | 3 | | | ED 4 |
99.00% | | 515 | | 91 | | 264 | | 40 | | | ED 5 |
99.00% | | 470 | | 93 | | 252 | | 15 | | | ED 6 |
99.00% | | 383 | | 85 | | 162 | | 20 | | | ED 7 |
99.00% | | 270 | | 72 | | 51 | | 1 | | | ED 8 |
99.00% | | 327 | | 58 | | 155 | | 6 | | | ED 9 |
99.00% | | 456 | | 97 | | 209 | | 4 | | | ED 10 |
99.00% | | 404 | | 61 | | 129 | | 9 | | | ED 11 |
99.00% | | 299 | | 72 | | 43 | | 2 | | | ED 12 |
99.00% | | 249 | | 88 | | 43 | | 13 | | | ED 13 |
99.00% | | 347 | | 70 | | 47 | | 2 | | | ED 14 |
99.00% | | 317 | | 69 | | 72 | | 4 | | | ED 15 |
99.00% | | 343 | | 73 | | 50 | | 6 | | | ED 16 |
99.00% | | 235 | | 31 | | 31 | | 2 | | | ED 17 |
99.00% | | 245 | | 64 | | 29 | | 2 | | | ED 18 |
99.00% | | 240 | | 58 | | 91 | | 2 | | | ED 19 |
99.00% | | 298 | | 48 | | 102 | | 9 | | | ED 20 |
99.00% | | 240 | | 75 | | 40 | | 2 | | | ED 21 |
99.00% | | 208 | | 48 | | 13 | | 2 | | | ED 22 |
99.00% | | 178 | | 40 | | 24 | | 1 | | | ED 23 |
99.00% | | 272 | | 85 | | 36 | | 1 | | | ED 24 |
99.00% | | 246 | | 56 | | 43 | | 2 | | | ED 25 |
99.00% | | 322 | | 133 | | 43 | | 10 | | | ED 26 |
99.00% | | 449 | | 87 | | 176 | | 11 | | | ED 27 |
99.00% | | 247 | | 84 | | 79 | | 2 | | | ED 28 |
99.00% | | 95 | | 18 | | 19 | | 2 | | | ED 29 |
99.00% | | 356 | | 53 | | 90 | | 2 | | | ED 30 |
99.00% | | 256 | | 73 | | 111 | | 15 | | | ED 31 |
99.00% | | 220 | | 51 | | 32 | | 12 | | | ED 32 |
99.00% | | 296 | | 61 | | 85 | | 27 | | | ED 33 |
99.00% | | 272 | | 80 | | 67 | | 15 | | | ED 34 |
99.00% | | 200 | | 52 | | 18 | | 2 | | | ED 35 |
99.00% | | 206 | | 54 | | 50 | | 5 | | | ED 36 |
99.00% | | 224 | | 56 | | 33 | | 2 | | | ED 37 |
99.00% | | 254 | | 106 | | 50 | | 10 | | | ED 38 |
99.00% | | 266 | | 191 | | 28 | | 10 | | | ED 39 |
99.00% | | 287 | | 73 | | 51 | | 4 | | | ED 40 |
99.00% | | 237 | | 69 | | 29 | | 11 | | | ED 41 |
99.00% | | 327 | | 106 | | 95 | | 5 | | | ED 42 |
99.00% | | 252 | | 80 | | 34 | | 7 | | | ED 43 |
99.00% | | 280 | | 83 | | 57 | | 2 | | | ED 44 |
99.00% | | 317 | | 55 | | 35 | | 1 | | | ED 45 |
99.00% | | 200 | | 36 | | 20 | | 1 | | | ED 46 |
99.00% | | 219 | | 71 | | 42 | | 7 | | | ED 47 |
99.00% | | 212 | | 32 | | 25 | | 9 | | | ED 48 |
99.00% | | 269 | | 40 | | 49 | | 5 | | | ED 49 |
99.00% | | 217 | | 45 | | 19 | | 2 | | | ED 50 |
99.00% | | 254 | | 55 | | 26 | | 0 | | | ED 51 |
99.00% | | 233 | | 52 | | 27 | | 2 | | | ED 52 |
99.00% | | 285 | | 63 | | 57 | | 5 | | | ED 53 |
99.00% | | 259 | | 51 | | 48 | | 4 | | | ED 54 |
99.00% | | 229 | | 54 | | 23 | | 2 | | | ED 55 |
99.00% | | 254 | | 37 | | 84 | | 3 | | | ED 56 |
99.00% | | 260 | | 56 | | 61 | | 1 | | | ED 57 |
99.00% | | 260 | | 65 | | 54 | | 1 | | | ED 58 |
99.00% | | 432 | | 61 | | 135 | | 5 | | | ED 59 |
99.00% | | 264 | | 66 | | 57 | | 0 | | | ED 60 |
99.00% | | 216 | | 67 | | 58 | | 1 | | | ED 61 |
99.00% | | 246 | | 50 | | 54 | | 3 | | | ED 62 |
99.00% | | 235 | | 52 | | 45 | | 2 | | | ED 63 |
99.00% | | 227 | | 24 | | 37 | | 0 | | | ED 64 |
99.00% | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | | ED 65 |
99.00% | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | | ED 66 |
99.00% | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | | Total | | | 17236 | | 4064 | | 4048 | | 357 | |
* Percentage of Scanners Reported
Information As Of: 2026-11-04 00:41:23 EST
AD: Assembly District
ED: Election District
|
