| | | | Darializa Avila Chevalier | | Jomo M. Williams | | Darializa Avila Chevalier | | WRITE-IN | | | | Reported * | | (Democratic) | | (Republican) | | (Working Families) | | | | | ED 1 |
85.71% | | 221 | | 26 | | 57 | | 2 | | | ED 2 |
99.00% | | 259 | | 22 | | 30 | | 1 | | | ED 3 |
99.00% | | 186 | | 9 | | 11 | | 0 | | | ED 4 |
99.00% | | 435 | | 28 | | 95 | | 8 | | | ED 5 |
99.00% | | 262 | | 29 | | 101 | | 4 | | | ED 6 |
99.00% | | 291 | | 32 | | 48 | | 0 | | | ED 7 |
99.00% | | 203 | | 29 | | 13 | | 1 | | | ED 8 |
99.00% | | 605 | | 102 | | 127 | | 7 | | | ED 9 |
99.00% | | 164 | | 20 | | 25 | | 1 | | | ED 10 |
99.00% | | 214 | | 25 | | 20 | | 0 | | | ED 11 |
99.00% | | 359 | | 34 | | 74 | | 2 | | | ED 12 |
99.00% | | 355 | | 53 | | 94 | | 4 | | | ED 13 |
99.00% | | 441 | | 46 | | 43 | | 2 | | | ED 14 |
99.00% | | 222 | | 25 | | 49 | | 3 | | | ED 15 |
99.00% | | 175 | | 16 | | 18 | | 1 | | | ED 16 |
99.00% | | 195 | | 25 | | 24 | | 0 | | | ED 17 |
99.00% | | 345 | | 37 | | 42 | | 1 | | | ED 18 |
99.00% | | 213 | | 27 | | 39 | | 2 | | | ED 19 |
99.00% | | 275 | | 24 | | 37 | | 0 | | | ED 20 |
99.00% | | 330 | | 30 | | 39 | | 0 | | | ED 21 |
99.00% | | 401 | | 43 | | 93 | | 4 | | | ED 22 |
99.00% | | 214 | | 25 | | 40 | | 2 | | | ED 23 |
99.00% | | 227 | | 18 | | 14 | | 0 | | | ED 25 |
99.00% | | 284 | | 44 | | 65 | | 1 | | | ED 26 |
99.00% | | 234 | | 29 | | 33 | | 1 | | | ED 27 |
99.00% | | 187 | | 31 | | 20 | | 2 | | | ED 28 |
99.00% | | 430 | | 59 | | 144 | | 8 | | | ED 29 |
99.00% | | 380 | | 49 | | 118 | | 5 | | | ED 30 |
99.00% | | 155 | | 22 | | 19 | | 1 | | | ED 31 |
99.00% | | 273 | | 45 | | 63 | | 3 | | | ED 32 |
99.00% | | 400 | | 61 | | 101 | | 3 | | | ED 33 |
99.00% | | 382 | | 53 | | 114 | | 1 | | | ED 34 |
99.00% | | 301 | | 40 | | 35 | | 0 | | | ED 35 |
99.00% | | 323 | | 43 | | 62 | | 2 | | | ED 36 |
99.00% | | 236 | | 27 | | 37 | | 3 | | | ED 37 |
99.00% | | 436 | | 100 | | 47 | | 3 | | | ED 38 |
99.00% | | 437 | | 57 | | 91 | | 1 | | | ED 39 |
99.00% | | 208 | | 28 | | 19 | | 0 | | | ED 40 |
99.00% | | 245 | | 42 | | 39 | | 0 | | | ED 41 |
99.00% | | 281 | | 51 | | 30 | | 0 | | | ED 42 |
99.00% | | 235 | | 31 | | 42 | | 1 | | | ED 43 |
99.00% | | 402 | | 60 | | 114 | | 2 | | | ED 44 |
99.00% | | 433 | | 73 | | 115 | | 2 | | | ED 45 |
99.00% | | 302 | | 62 | | 26 | | 1 | | | ED 46 |
99.00% | | 385 | | 47 | | 62 | | 1 | | | ED 47 |
99.00% | | 397 | | 69 | | 50 | | 4 | | | ED 48 |
99.00% | | 427 | | 64 | | 49 | | 0 | | | ED 49 |
99.00% | | 176 | | 21 | | 16 | | 0 | | | ED 50 |
99.00% | | 167 | | 35 | | 8 | | 0 | | | ED 51 |
99.00% | | 404 | | 86 | | 32 | | 4 | | | ED 56 |
99.00% | | 221 | | 32 | | 50 | | 1 | | | ED 57 |
99.00% | | 271 | | 30 | | 53 | | 2 | | | ED 58 |
99.00% | | 273 | | 58 | | 25 | | 1 | | | ED 59 |
99.00% | | 223 | | 28 | | 21 | | 1 | | | ED 60 |
99.00% | | 295 | | 28 | | 47 | | 2 | | | ED 61 |
99.00% | | 132 | | 35 | | 15 | | 4 | | | ED 72 |
99.00% | | 89 | | 11 | | 22 | | 0 | | | ED 73 |
99.00% | | 131 | | 15 | | 19 | | 0 | | | ED 78 |
99.00% | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | | ED 80 |
99.00% | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | | ED 81 |
99.00% | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | | ED 82 |
99.00% | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | | Total | | | 16747 | | 2291 | | 2936 | | 105 | |
* Percentage of Scanners Reported
Information As Of: 2026-11-04 00:41:08 EST
AD: Assembly District
ED: Election District
|
